The Emperor Paid No Taxes
Monday October 3, 2016
Click here for an Easy Print Version
The 2016 Mullings Subscription Drive is off to a great start. For those of you who have been early adopters, thank you. For those of you who have had other things to do, please take a moment and consider subscribing.
You know you can read Mullings for free, but if you can participate with $30 (about 8 cents a day), I would very much appreciate it.
Not only do you get Mullings about twice a week (sometimes more), but you also have access to Reed Galen's very popular "Singularity" column that is drawing more and more attention.
If you can, please do one of the following: Go to
HERE and subscribe using a credit card.
If those choices make you nervous, you can send a check to:
Or, to subscribe using PayPal click here:
PO Box 320123
Alexandria, VA 22320
In light of what was in all probability an illegally leaked copy of a couple of pages of Donald Trump's 1995 tax return, we now know he paid no federal income taxes for 18 years.
It seems that Trump lost $916 million in one year. The tax code allows you to reimburse yourself for bad business decisions by deducting a ginormous one-year loss from three years before the loss to 15 years into the future.
I don't usually share personal stuff with you, but I will admit I haven't lost $916 million total. Lifetime.
So, we have to give Trump some credit for having the audacity to (a) invest enough in one year to lose $916 million and (b) make the rest of us pay for his mistake.
I took one accounting class in college, so I will not pretend to know any more than I read in Sunday's papers about how this works. But here's what I do know: Regular people don't legally avoid paying federal income taxes for 18 years.
The irony is: This is exactly the kind of thing that has work-a-day Americans so angry. Work at a major financial institution that bought and sold worthless mortgage instruments? No problem.
Here. Take this bonus money and build an addition onto your house in the Hamptons.
Moved into a house having been duped by greasy mortgage brokers to feed those financial institutions? Big problem.
We're taking your house back. Your stuff is on the lawn. Get out.
For the Trump campaign it doesn't matter that this billion-dollar-write-off is legal. What it demonstrates is that there is one set of rules for the richest Americans and a completely different set of rules for the rest of us.
For most of us, the only time we think about income taxes is on April 15 when we file our tax forms. Since 1943, when Congress passed the "Current Tax Withholding Act" to provide a constant stream of revenue to pay for World War II, most of us never see the money.
Employers are required to withhold federal and state income taxes as well as our share of contributions ("Contribution," as used here, has nothing to do with voluntary giving) used to fund Social Security, Medicare, unemployment compensation, and worker's compensation programs.
As the U.S. Treasury itself points out the move to automatic withholding:
"greatly reduced the taxpayer's awareness of the amount of tax being collected, i.e. it reduced the transparency of the tax, which made it easier to raise taxes in the future."
Unless you are Donald Trump or any one of a small number of mega-developers for whom income taxes are just another piece on their personal financial chessboard to be sacrificed in search of every last penny of personal profit.
Trump defenders properly point out that he used the tax code as written. And, if we don't like it, we can demand the tax code be changed.
Changes in the tax code that include increasing the income taxes paid by rich people are not exactly welcomed with parades and balloon drops in the hearing rooms of the House Ways and Means, or Senate Finance Committees.
The only thing that is met with more scorn than raising taxes on the very wealthiest, is reducing taxes on the most middle-class.
Next time a member of the House Freedom Caucus (the Tea Party Members) complains about more Federal spending on public programs, ask him or her whether a program that allows one person to avoid federal taxes for 20 years is a good use of federal funds or a bad use of federal funds.
Those 18 years of income taxes Trump (and who knows how many others) didn't pay would have helped make money available for child care, infrastructure, defense, or - and pay close attention here - reducing the federal debt.
It might be legal but, like the Emperor who wore no clothes, Trump paying no taxes is not a pretty sight.
The Jewish holiday of Rosh Hashanah started last night. If it applies to you, have a happy and healthy New Year.
On the Secret Decoder Ring page today: A link to the New York Times article on Trump's taxes and the Wikipedia entry on the history of tax withholding. Also the RealClearPolitics polling average page.
The Mullfoto is a throwback to my radio days from over the weekend.
-- END --
Copyright © 2016 Barrington Worldwide, LLC. All Rights Reserved
Paid Mullings Subscriber!
(To join the FREE mailing list or to unsubscribe Click Here)
Current Issue |
Ring | Past
Issues | Email
Rich | Rich
Copyright ©2013 Barrington Worldwide, LLC | Site design by Campaign